Birth Control and the Church
Anthony Kowalski has this to write in response to Mark Shea's article we ran on HSI titled Cooperating with the Creator: Birth Control and the Church. Readers are welcome to comment.
The article has some fine points in it, but is clearly written for a very conservative base. While I applaud some of its insights, I am uncomfortable with suggesting that young married couples need to first check the period of fertility before considering love-making.
Don't get me wrong, I have never purchased nor used contraceptives in my life, nor have I ever practiced artificial birth control of any kind. Yet my appreciation for the beauty of God's love and the sublimity of the marriage act leads me to a different approach in advising married couples. Self-discipline is of course necessary in all areas of life. But I tend to be much more understanding of married couples and the conclusions to which they are led in conscience during the course of their sexual and marital life. I can no longer be apodictic and absolute in such matters. I find frequently that those who speak in absolutes regarding sexual activity don't really know what they are talking about.
I recognize the "gratia supponit natura" argument and the biblical interpretations contained in this article. But I have become weary of such argumentation. And as for the scientific world, I find more to praise about the advances in science than to condemn. I have moreover come to admire the writings of Huston Smith (retired professor at Berkeley) who argues for the need for the mystical and the spiritual in our lives, and the broad and necessary insights which they bring, while respecting and seeing no contradiction with the scientific advances of our time. I will return to the article again in the future. For now, that is all I wish to say about it.
The article has some fine points in it, but is clearly written for a very conservative base. While I applaud some of its insights, I am uncomfortable with suggesting that young married couples need to first check the period of fertility before considering love-making.
Don't get me wrong, I have never purchased nor used contraceptives in my life, nor have I ever practiced artificial birth control of any kind. Yet my appreciation for the beauty of God's love and the sublimity of the marriage act leads me to a different approach in advising married couples. Self-discipline is of course necessary in all areas of life. But I tend to be much more understanding of married couples and the conclusions to which they are led in conscience during the course of their sexual and marital life. I can no longer be apodictic and absolute in such matters. I find frequently that those who speak in absolutes regarding sexual activity don't really know what they are talking about.
I recognize the "gratia supponit natura" argument and the biblical interpretations contained in this article. But I have become weary of such argumentation. And as for the scientific world, I find more to praise about the advances in science than to condemn. I have moreover come to admire the writings of Huston Smith (retired professor at Berkeley) who argues for the need for the mystical and the spiritual in our lives, and the broad and necessary insights which they bring, while respecting and seeing no contradiction with the scientific advances of our time. I will return to the article again in the future. For now, that is all I wish to say about it.
3 Comments:
God created us to multiply and subdue the earth... nowhere does it say that it is a crime to plan your family...at least I dont remember reading it in the Bible.
-----------------------------------
Biblically, (the usual suspect)
Onan was the second son of Judah. After his older brother Er died, Onan was required by the tradition of levirate marriage to marry Er's widow Tamar. According to Genesis 38:7-9, when he had sexual intercourse with Tamar he "spilt his seed upon the ground" because the resulting child would be considered his late brother's, not his. In response to this transgression, God killed Onan.
--------------------------------
While many theories are that God killed Onan because he practiced contraception (Coitus Interruptus)
If you read between the lines God dealt with Onan because of "The Motives" behind this act of spilling his seed to the ground. Onan was selfish and didnt want to give Tamar an heir because it would be considered his brother's child...
While people see the outsides of a person the Lord sees the depths of the heart...
Many are the plans of a Mans heart but the Lord alters his steps...
God Bless you...
Lyndon
What a strawman argument.
Hi. I am not at all clear what you are getting at with the suggestion that Mark Shea's article is clearly conservative. It seems that you are suggesting it is therefore somehow "behind the times", and not acknowledging the place of science sufficiently.
I would suggest looking at Janet Smith's article on HSI (http://www.holyspiritinteractive.net/columns/guests/janetsmith/contraception.asp) which is an excellent summary of the way in which birth control has impacted our societies.
Science includes the social sciences, and the evidence is clear that in the area of birth control, our failure to take acount of "natural law" has dire consequences. It makes for sober reading and suggests to me that Mark Shea's article is in fact highly contemporary and VERY relevant for today's world.
God bless you ....
Simon A
Post a Comment
<< Home